ESA Fellows

ESA designates as Fellows of the Society certain members who have made outstanding contributions to a wide range of fields served by ESA. Such contributions include, but are not restricted to, those that advance or apply ecological knowledge in academics, government, non-profit organizations, and the private sector.

The designation of an ESA member as an ESA Fellow is an honorific title. Fellows are elected for life. 

Eligibility Criteria 

• Any current regular member of ESA who has been a regular member of ESA for at least five years (not necessarily consecutive) is eligible to be nominated to be an ESA Fellow. For these purposes, a regular member is defined as a non-student, dues-paying member. 
• A nominee is expected to have been a member of the profession for at least fifteen years. In most cases, this will be interpreted to mean fifteen years from PhD. 
• Demonstrated excellence of contributions to one or several of the following areas: (1) research and discovery, (2) communication and outreach or education and pedagogy, (3) application of ecology to management and policy.
• Members of the ESA Fellows Awards Subcommittee and Governing Board may not be nominated to be ESA Fellows while in office. 

Nomination Procedures  

The nomination of an individual to be and ESA Fellow must be made by three members of ESA excluding members of the Fellows Selection Committee. No ESA Member can nominate more than two individuals in a year. Nomination packets will be considered for one year only. If a nominee is not selected, nominators are strongly encouraged to resubmit updated nominations for the next cycle. 

Nominations shall be submitted electronically and consist of: 

1. The names of the three nominators.
2. The name of the nominee and year she/he earned a PhD.
3. A citation of at most 50 words proposed for use if the nominee is selected to be a Fellow. Examples of citations can be found on the ESA Fellows Website, by clicking on any of the past Fellows’ names.
4. A joint letter of nomination by the three nominators describes the nominee’s most significant contributions and their impact in the areas of research & discovery, communication & outreach or teaching & pedagogy, and application to management & policy. Details regarding the criteria used by the Selection Committee for evaluating significant contributions and impact can be found below. The letter of nomination should be no longer than two pages.
5. At least one, preferably two additional letters of support from people besides the nominators should be included to provide detailed insight about a nominee’s professional accomplishments and contributions. These letters can come from anyone, including non-members. The letters of support should be no longer than two pages.
6. A curriculum vitae of at most four pages. The CV should include evidence of outstanding contributions as outlined under the eligibility criteria and should be organized as follows: education, positions held, awards and honors, 10-15 select publications (and total number), current and recent grants, and select professional activity (including separate categories for research & development, communication & outreach, teaching & pedagogy, application to management & policy, and service to the discipline).

Criteria for evaluating significant contributions and impact:
Below are some possible indicators of excellence that the selection committee will consider in selecting Fellows, so nominators and letter writers should speak to these in crafting their letters. These should not be viewed as an exclusive or complete list. Of course, Early Career Fellows and ESA Fellows will be evaluated against standards that are appropriate to their respective career stage.

Indicators of excellence include but are not restricted to the following:

Research and Discovery: Exceptional intellectual contributions (e.g., as described by nominator and letter writers), high quality publications, high impact publications (e.g., high number of citations), high numbers of publications, large numbers of significant grants, evidence of exceptional leadership in research (e.g. leadership on major collaborative projects).

Communication/Outreach, Education/Pedagogy: Creation of media for the public that effectively communicates science, significant engagement with stakeholder groups, organization of citizen science efforts, legislative testimony, large numbers of graduate students and postdocs mentored, placement of graduate students and postdocs in competitive positions, high quantity of undergraduate students mentored, high quality of undergraduate student mentorship (e.g., publication/professional meeting attendance with undergraduates), leadership in training/mentoring (e.g., at a programmatic level), significant grants related to communication/outreach or education/pedagogy, leadership in communication/outreach or education/pedagogy, leadership in producing national and international reports, exceptional service to the discipline (e.g., editorships, holding executive positions in societies).

Application to Management/Policy: Significant development and codification of policy or management strategies; outstanding work within agencies, NGOs, or the private sector to effect policy or management change; significant and outstanding service on advisory boards to agencies (e.g., state, federal), NGOs, or businesses; other evidence of contributions to the application of ecology to management or policy.

Nominations for this award should include a joint letter of nomination from all three nominators, a curriculum vitae at most four pages and no more than two additional letters of support. 

Apply Today